A question came in from at-Kentucky Native Gardens on YouTube asking why Flock cameras are controversial.

That's a great question because there's been a real ongoing debate about these cameras here in Lexington. There are now 125 Flock cameras across the city, and the controversy really centers around several key issues. First, there's the privacy concern - these devices photograph the rear of all passing vehicles, then use AI technology to gather those vehicles' license plate numbers and distinguishing features, including their make, model, color, bumper stickers, and more. Some people feel that's creating a constant surveillance state.

And I imagine where they put them matters too, right?

Absolutely. That's been one of the biggest points of contention. Some Lexingtonians initially had issues with Flock camera locations - the city's first district has twenty-one cameras, which is more than any other district. The Lex-Fayette N-A-A-C-P has raised concerns about equity, with President Whit Whitaker saying there's no real equity analysis of the cameras, placement of the cameras, relative to demographic and socioeconomic distribution.

Have there been any actual problems with the cameras beyond just the placement concerns?

There have been some issues. There was a case where Lexington Police arrested the wrong man on a murder warrant - they thought they arrested Nicholas Ruiz, but it was actually Javier Manriquez, and the police department credited the Flock cameras for the arrest. There are also broader concerns about how these cameras have been used by Immigration and Customs Enforcement to target minority communities and to track people seeking reproductive care in states with restrictive abortion laws.

So despite the controversy, they're still expanding the program?

They are. The city sees results - since the first camera went up in twenty twenty-two, they've helped officers charge six hundred eighty-six people with fifteen hundred ninety-four charges and recover three hundred thirty-seven stolen vehicles. But critics like the N-A-A-C-P's Whit Whitaker say police and the city could do more to improve communication and transparency, calling for regular external audits not guided by the organizations in charge of policing.

Listen live: The Lexington Times runs a 24/7 local news livestream — watch on YouTube or on Facebook. This transcript is from a recent on-air segment.